During the design phase, it as estimated that 180 days were required to complete settlement of the underlying soft soils as a result of the weight of conventional fill surcharge. On top of that, 100 days of Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) time was allocated by the Contractor for the bridge work. This would have required about 9 months just for lane closure, which was deemed unacceptable by project stake holders. According to the case study, the use of GeoFoam aided in the elimination of the 180-day required settlement time frame, therefore greatly reducing the required MOT time.
What's interesting to note about this GeoFoam EPS block manufactured by Dyplast Products, is that it has a unit weight of 1.35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), which is about 1% of the unit weight of conventional limerock fill used in Florida. Additionally, according to the manufacturer, the GeoFoam block has "compressive strengths equivalent to compacted soil at weights approaching 50 times higher."
This is a nice case study showing the usefulness of this type of geosynthetic. Have you had any experiences using GeoFoam blocks in any project? If so, which ones?
Article: Case Study
No comments:
Post a Comment